Sounds good. See you there!
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025, at 7:33 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote: > Ted, > > The next steps sound logical to me. Let’s check at IETF-122 for the WG > consensus about the last changes, but until now: no reactions on the DNSSD > mailing list. > > Regards > > -éric > > *From: *Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, 4 March 2025 at 23:13 > *To: *Sandy Ginoza <sgin...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > *Cc: *Sarah Tarrant <starr...@staff.rfc-editor.org>, Stuart Cheshire > <chesh...@apple.com>, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com>, RFC Editor > <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>, dnssd-...@ietf.org <dnssd-...@ietf.org>, > dnssd-cha...@ietf.org <dnssd-cha...@ietf.org>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org > <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, David Schinazi <dschinazi.i...@gmail.com> > *Subject: *Re: [AD] [C507] AUTH48 Questions: RFC-to-be 9665 > <draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-25> and RFC-to-be 9664 > <draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08> > The versions currently published contain all our edits. We still need to > confirm with the working group. I suspect at this point the conversation will > happen at IETF in Bangkok. It would be helpful if someone on the RFC editor > team could look at our edits—if the WG wants any changes they will be a very > small tweak to what is there now. > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 9:44 PM, Sandy Ginoza wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> Just checking to see if there has been any progress with RFCs-to-be 9664 and >> 9665? >> >> Thanks, >> RFC Editor/sg >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 2025, at 6:55 AM, Edward Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: >> > >> > The situation at present is that all edits are based on the RFCs-to-be, >> > and are in github. I don't think it's technically possible to submit an >> > RFC-to-be as an internet draft, but we expect the working group to want to >> > review the changes. That being the case, we may back out just the RFC >> > keyword changes in order to produce something that can be published as a >> > -26 draft, but leave those in on github. I would suggest that top-of-tree >> > on github would be the document for the RFC editor to work on, rather than >> > the intermediate draft, if we follow that plan. >> > >> > I think we need to have a conversation with Eric and possibly the WG >> > chairs about next steps once the edits are done. >> > >> >> On Feb 11, 2025, at 15:20, Sarah Tarrant <starr...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Stuart, >> >> >> >> Thank you much for the update. For our understanding, is it correct that >> >> your edits will be in the edited copy of RFCs-to-be 9664 and 9665 (i.e., >> >> are the RPC edits being incorporated into GitHub as well), as opposed to >> >> the approved draft? We ask because you mentioned possibly submitting a >> >> new draft next week, and we are hopeful that any new draft would be based >> >> on the the most current file possible. >> >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> RFC Editor/st >> >> >> >>> On Feb 7, 2025, at 4:14 PM, Stuart Cheshire <chesh...@apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Feb 5, 2025, at 15:45, Sarah Tarrant <starr...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hello Ted, Stuart, and Éric, >> >>>> >> >>>> We do not believe we have received the XML file from you yet. It >> >>>> appears that the last update was on 1/20/25. >> >>> >> >>> Sorry Sarah. I made my final edits for draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease >> >>> (9664) and sent the email about it on 20th January saying that the >> >>> document was complete and ready for Ted’s final review, but it appears >> >>> we had an email delivery failure of some kind because Ted never received >> >>> the email. I have just talked about this with Ted via text message, and >> >>> I have re-sent the lost email to Ted’s apple.com email address for Ted >> >>> to address on Monday. >> >>> >> >>> This week I am in Philadelphia for the Thread Group Board of Directors >> >>> meeting. On my flight back to California this weekend I will go through >> >>> my handwritten notes for draft-ietf-dnssd-srp (9665) and make the >> >>> necessary GitHub edits, so that they are also ready for Ted to review on >> >>> Monday morning. Ted mentioned that we may want to get a final working >> >>> group review for 9665 to make sure everyone agrees with the changes. We >> >>> will talk with Éric Vyncke and get his advice. IETF 122 in Bangkok is >> >>> just five weeks away now, so one possible plan could be: We make the >> >>> edits, submit draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-09 next week, give the >> >>> working group four weeks for a final review, and then wrap it up in >> >>> person at the Bangkok meeting. >> >>> >> >>> Stuart Cheshire >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
