Hi Authors, Thank you for your patience as we work through this issue.
We have updated the document as requested and incorporated the new U+ and UTF-8 notations for the Hebrew date. We ask that you verify the changes to ensure our updates are correct. After some further testing on our end, we are still unable to get the Hebrew date to align correctly in the text output. Moving forward, we believe the best solution is to 1) ensure that all changes in the document are approved by each party, and 2) place this document into Tools Improvement (TI) state once AUTH48 is complete. As of right now, the formatting of the Hebrew date is the only outstanding issue. Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We will await approvals from each party prior to moving forward resolving this issue in the publication process. The updated files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9676.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9676.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9676.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9676.xml The updated diff files have been posted here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9676-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9676-rfcdiff.html (side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9676-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes only) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9676-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) The AUTH48 status page can be found here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9676 To track the issue in GitHub, please see: https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/issues/1224 Thank you, RFC Editor/mc > On Feb 7, 2025, at 6:38 AM, ENRICO FRANCESCONI <enrico.francesc...@cnr.it> > wrote: > > P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Dear Madison, Dear Eliot, > thanks for your suggestions. As for the conversion Latin --> Hebrew of the > example date, we have probably used a wrong converter, so we agree to use the > conversion you suggest. > As for the rest, please find in-line our replies. > Thanks! > > Pierluigi and Enrico > > > From: Madison Church <mchu...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > Sent: 05 February 2025 18:28 > To: Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <rfc-...@rfc-editor.org>; > ENRICO FRANCESCONI <enrico.francesc...@cnr.it>; pierluigi.spin...@gmail.com > <pierluigi.spin...@gmail.com>; caterina.l...@gmail.com > <caterina.l...@gmail.com> > Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>; superu...@gmail.com > <superu...@gmail.com>; auth48archive@rfc-editor.org > <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> > Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review > Hi Authors and Eliot, > > Thank you for your replies! > > Authors - To confirm, you are suggesting that the example be shown as the > following (Removing the U+ notation and keeping the Hebrew format): > > (e.g., "September 2, 99" will be written in ISO plus Hebrew format as > "1999-09-02|אלול,תשנ"ט.21"). > > Fine to remove the U+ format and keep the Hebrew format as in the example > above (end of Section 3.6). > Obviously, the right conversion into Hebrew characters (you suggest here > below) is to be used. > > Please consider that in Section 3.6, all the occurrences of the example > Hebrew date, in Hebrew, U+ and UTF-8 notations, have to be updated > accordingly, so that they are all aligned with the new conversion you suggest. > > > > > > Please note that this calendar converter [1] translates 1999-09-02 to כ״א > בֶּאֱלוּל תשנ״ט, and it does not use Arabic numerals nor punctuation in the > translation. Please confirm the use of Arabic numerals and punctuation for > the date-loc format. > > [1] https://www.hebcal.com/converter?gd=2&gm=9&gy=1999&g2h=1 > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/mc > > > On Feb 2, 2025, at 1:38 PM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) > > <rfc-...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > > > My view: > > On 02.02.2025 19:52, ENRICO FRANCESCONI wrote: > >> > >> 1) to remove "date-loc" and keep only the ISO version of any date > >> 2) to keep "date-loc" including, as example, a Hebrew date transformed > >> into ISO latin characters (ex: 21.Elul,5759) > >> 3) to keep "date-loc" including just the Unicode U+ version, without using > >> Hebrew characters > >> > >> Please let us know what do you prefer and we proceed with the update of > >> the document > > I don't like any of these options because none of them provide an example > > that people going left to right would actually use. I am also concerned > > about Chinese, fwiw. > > Eliot > > > <image.png> <image.png> <image.png> <image.png> <image.png> Enrico Francesconi > CNR, INSTITUTE OF LEGAL INFORMATICS AND JUDICIAL SYSTEMS > Research Director > Tel. +390554399611 > enrico.francesc...@cnr.it > enrico.francesc...@igsg.cnr.it > via de' Barucci, 20, 50127 – Florence (Italy) > www.cnr.it > Devolvi il 5×1000 al CNR > CF 80054330586 -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
