Hi Authors and Eliot, Thank you for your replies!
Authors - To confirm, you are suggesting that the example be shown as the following (Removing the U+ notation and keeping the Hebrew format): (e.g., "September 2, 99" will be written in ISO plus Hebrew format as "1999-09-02|אלול,תשנ"ט.21"). Please note that this calendar converter [1] translates 1999-09-02 to כ״א בֶּאֱלוּל תשנ״ט, and it does not use Arabic numerals nor punctuation in the translation. Please confirm the use of Arabic numerals and punctuation for the date-loc format. [1] https://www.hebcal.com/converter?gd=2&gm=9&gy=1999&g2h=1 Thank you, RFC Editor/mc > On Feb 2, 2025, at 1:38 PM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) > <rfc-...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > My view: > On 02.02.2025 19:52, ENRICO FRANCESCONI wrote: >> >> 1) to remove "date-loc" and keep only the ISO version of any date >> 2) to keep "date-loc" including, as example, a Hebrew date transformed into >> ISO latin characters (ex: 21.Elul,5759) >> 3) to keep "date-loc" including just the Unicode U+ version, without using >> Hebrew characters >> >> Please let us know what do you prefer and we proceed with the update of the >> document > I don't like any of these options because none of them provide an example > that people going left to right would actually use. I am also concerned > about Chinese, fwiw. > Eliot -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
