auth48archive  

Messages by Date

• 2025/02/19 [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9737 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-layrec-04> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9736 <draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up-05> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: Cluster C324 questions: RFCs 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking>, 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr>, and 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9> Jonathan Lennox via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9695 <draft-ietf-mediaman-haptics-05> for your review Yeshwant Muthusamy via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9740 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-18> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-07> for your review Jonathan Lennox via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9-16> for your review Jonathan Lennox via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] A wording change in the VP9 payload in AUTH48. Jonathan Lennox via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9711 <draft-ietf-rats-eat-31> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: Cluster C324 questions: RFCs 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking>, 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr>, and 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9> Jonathan Lennox via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: [IANA #1412740] [IANA action requested] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Aitken, Paul via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: Cluster C324 questions: RFCs 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking>, 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr>, and 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9> Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: Cluster C324 questions: RFCs 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking>, 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr>, and 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9> Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-07> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9-16> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-07> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9-16> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: [IANA #1412740] [IANA action requested] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9736 <draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up-05> for your review Paolo Lucente via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9736 <draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up-05> for your review Paolo Lucente via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: [IANA #1412740] [IANA action requested] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Aitken, Paul via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9719 <draft-ietf-rift-yang-17> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9730 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-controller-inter-work-17> for your review Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9733 <draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-13> for your review David von Oheimb via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9733 <draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-13> for your review David von Oheimb via auth48archive
• 2025/02/19 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9-16> for your review Magnus Flodman via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9-16> for your review Stefan Holmer via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] [IANA #1412740] [IANA action requested] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Sabrina Tanamal via RT via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] [IANA #1412740] [IANA action requested] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Sabrina Tanamal via RT via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Murray S. Kucherawy via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Espen Berger (espeberg) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9746 <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-11> for your review Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: *[Document Shepherd] Re: Sec consideration sec (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Lynne Bartholomew via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9731 <draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-29> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9678 <draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-12> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9733 <draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-13> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9705 <draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-22> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9731 <draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-29> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Stewart Bryant via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: *[Document Shepherd] Re: Sec consideration sec (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9740 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-18> for your review Benoit Claise via auth48archive
• 2025/02/17 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9740 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-18> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/17 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9740 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-18> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/17 [auth48] Re: [IANA action requested] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Benoit Claise via auth48archive
• 2025/02/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9719 <draft-ietf-rift-yang-17> for your review zhang via auth48archive
• 2025/02/16 [auth48] Re: [IANA action requested] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Aitken, Paul via auth48archive
• 2025/02/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9719 <draft-ietf-rift-yang-17> for your review Xufeng Liu via auth48archive
• 2025/02/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9678 <draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-12> for your review Jari Arkko via auth48archive
• 2025/02/15 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/14 [auth48] Re: [IANA action requested] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/14 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/14 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Tony Li via auth48archive
• 2025/02/14 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/14 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review James Guichard via auth48archive
• 2025/02/14 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/14 [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9737 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-layrec-04> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2025/02/14 [auth48] Re: Cluster C324 questions: RFCs 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking>, 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr>, and 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9> Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/14 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9-16> for your review Zaheduzzaman Sarker via auth48archive
• 2025/02/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/13 [auth48] [IANA #1412740] [IANA action requested] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Sabrina Tanamal via RT via auth48archive
• 2025/02/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9738 <draft-ietf-extra-imap-messagelimit-10> for your review Alexey Melnikov via auth48archive
• 2025/02/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Takuya Miyasaka via auth48archive
• 2025/02/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-07> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9719 <draft-ietf-rift-yang-17> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review Jiankang Yao via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Rebecca VanRheenen via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Mike McBride via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Rebecca VanRheenen via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Stig Venaas (svenaas) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9694 <draft-ietf-mediaman-toplevel-06> for your review Martin J . Dürst via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review Jonathan Hoyland via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review David Oliver via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Rebecca VanRheenen via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Rebecca VanRheenen via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9730 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-controller-inter-work-17> for your review Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9730 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-controller-inter-work-17> for your review Linyi (Yi) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Murray S. Kucherawy via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Jonathan Lennox via auth48archive
• 2025/02/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review Arnt Gulbrandsen via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Young Lee via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Murray S. Kucherawy via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9694 <draft-ietf-mediaman-toplevel-06> for your review Murray S. Kucherawy via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review lizhenqiang--- via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Stig Venaas (svenaas) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9736 <draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up-05> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9736 <draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up-05> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: *[Document Shepherd] Re: Sec consideration sec (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Jean Mahoney via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review David Schinazi via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: *[Document Shepherd] Re: Sec consideration sec (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Jean Mahoney via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review David Schinazi via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9695 <draft-ietf-mediaman-haptics-05> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9725 <draft-ietf-wish-whip-16> for your review Rebecca VanRheenen via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review Jonathan Hoyland via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: [AD] [C507] AUTH48 Questions: RFC-to-be 9665 <draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-25> and RFC-to-be 9664 <draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08> Edward Lemon via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: [AD] [C507] AUTH48 Questions: RFC-to-be 9665 <draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-25> and RFC-to-be 9664 <draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9725 <draft-ietf-wish-whip-16> for your review Sergio Garcia Murillo via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review Bron Gondwana via auth48archive
• 2025/02/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review Jiankang Yao via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Dongjie (Jimmy) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9739 <draft-ietf-pim-light-11> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9746 <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-11> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9746 <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-11> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: *[Document Shepherd] Re: Sec consideration sec (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Jean Mahoney via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9733 <draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-13> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9733 <draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-13> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Tony Li via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: [IANA action requested] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Aitken, Paul via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9692 <draft-ietf-rift-rift-24> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] [IANA action requested] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9738 <draft-ietf-extra-imap-messagelimit-10> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review Pete Resnick via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review Pete Resnick via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9678 <draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-12> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9692 <draft-ietf-rift-rift-24> for your review Antoni Przygienda via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9705 <draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-22> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9692 <draft-ietf-rift-rift-24> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Stewart Bryant via auth48archive
• 2025/02/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review Arnt Gulbrandsen via auth48archive
• 2025/02/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/09 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review David Oliver via auth48archive
• 2025/02/08 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Dongjie (Jimmy) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9732 <draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9731 <draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-29> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9711 <draft-ietf-rats-eat-31> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9711 <draft-ietf-rats-eat-31> for your review Carl Wallace via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9724 <draft-ietf-madinas-mac-address-randomization-15> for your review Rebecca VanRheenen via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9724 <draft-ietf-madinas-mac-address-randomization-15> for your review Rebecca VanRheenen via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: [AD] [C507] AUTH48 Questions: RFC-to-be 9665 <draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-25> and RFC-to-be 9664 <draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08> Stuart Cheshire via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Jonathan Lennox via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9-16> for your review Jonathan Lennox via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9737 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-layrec-04> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-07> for your review Jonathan Lennox via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review James Guichard via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review James Guichard via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review James Guichard via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] AD - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9730 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-controller-inter-work-17> for your review Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2025/02/07 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review ENRICO FRANCESCONI via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: question - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review chengweiqiang via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: question - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Xiao Min via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9695 <draft-ietf-mediaman-haptics-05> for your review Yeshwant Muthusamy via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: *[Document Shepherd] Re: Sec consideration sec (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Suresh Krishnan via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9737 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-layrec-04> for your review Thomas Haynes via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9737 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-layrec-04> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9737 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-layrec-04> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: question - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9734 <draft-ietf-lamps-im-keyusage-04> for your review Rohan Mahy via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9734 <draft-ietf-lamps-im-keyusage-04> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Benoit Claise via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: *[Document Shepherd] Re: Sec consideration sec (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: *[Document Shepherd] Re: Sec consideration sec (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: [AD] [C507] AUTH48 Questions: RFC-to-be 9665 <draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-25> and RFC-to-be 9664 <draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08> Eric Vyncke (evyncke) via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Mohamed Boucadair via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review Antoni Przygienda via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Mohamed Boucadair via auth48archive
• 2025/02/06 [auth48] Re: question - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Xiao Min via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] 回复: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9730 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-controller-inter-work-17> for your review Zhenghaomian via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: *[Document Shepherd] Re: Sec consideration sec (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Suresh Krishnan via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9719 <draft-ietf-rift-yang-17> for your review Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] question - Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9711 <draft-ietf-rats-eat-31> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9734 <draft-ietf-lamps-im-keyusage-04> for your review Rohan Mahy via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9734 <draft-ietf-lamps-im-keyusage-04> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: [AD] [C507] AUTH48 Questions: RFC-to-be 9665 <draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-25> and RFC-to-be 9664 <draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08> Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9730 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-controller-inter-work-17> for your review Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9736 <draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up-05> for your review Paolo Lucente via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9719 <draft-ietf-rift-yang-17> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9729 <draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2025/02/05 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9714 <draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-18> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive

• Earlier messages
• Later messages