On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Richard Henwood <richard.henw...@arm.com> wrote:
> After briefly chatting with Josh at RH summit, the short term goal is 'build > Atomic Host for AArch64'. > Following that, I guess there might be some work to make Atomic Registry 'do > the right thing'? And orchestration 'do the right thing'? Will kube schedule a container on a host that can't run it? i.e. a container with x86 code on a AArch64 host, or vice versa? I think that it needs to DTRT sooner rather than later if the scheduling isn't smart yet. In the meantime I assume that you could run a separate cluster of ARM vs. x86, but that would probably be less than ideal I think. Other thoughts?
