On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/25/2016 05:08 PM, Jason DeTiberus wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Jason Brooks <jbro...@redhat.com > > <mailto:jbro...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com > > <mailto:jber...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > Partly due to lugging my micro-cluster around, I've been getting a > lot > > > of interest in having an ARM port of Atomic Host (ARM64, mostly). > Not > > > just hobby user interest, but interest from SDN and IoT makers. > > > > > > I'm raising this on atomic-devel because I'm not sure if it makes > more > > > sense to start on this via Fedora or CentOS. Thoughts? > > > > I'm into it. I imagine there are parties on the CentOS and Fedora > > sides who'd be into this too, and any progress on one side will > > probably benefit the other side. > > > > I think docker and kube can both run on ARM, and CentOS and Fedora > run > > on ARM. I don't know about the ostree bits... > > > > > > I like the idea, as long as the focus is on arm64. Unfortunately, I > > think arm64 support for raspberry pi's are still a work in progress > > (thought, I think CentOS has been making progress in this area as of > late). > > Well, enabling the raspberry Pi would be nice, but not really the main > target. As fun at the Pis are to play with, I'm a lot more concerned > with enabling folks who want to really build systems, and that means > "real" ARM64. > +1, my concern is there have been quite a few requests for the Pi, mainly for the demo/wow factor. -- Jason DeTiberus
