On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Richard Henwood <richard.henw...@arm.com> wrote: > <snip> >> > Well, enabling the raspberry Pi would be nice, but not really the main >> > target. As fun at the Pis are to play with, I'm a lot more concerned >> > with enabling folks who want to really build systems, and that means >> > "real" ARM64. >> > >> > >> > +1, my concern is there have been quite a few requests for the Pi, >> > mainly for the demo/wow factor. >> >> Oh, no question; if we had this, I'd take a pi cluster on the road with me. >> But >> let's get things working on real ARM first, and debug the Pi later. >> > > I've been kicking around with AArch64 using Fedora 24 with the goal of > building Atomic Host. I have a AArch64 server machine for this. Linaro has an > ARM64 developer cloud you too are interested in playing around (let me know > if I can help with that). Following F20 instructions [1] it seems that I need > 'rpm-ostree-autobuilder', which is my current stumbling block (any > suggestions welcome!)
There's a more recent byo howto at: https://github.com/jasonbrooks/byo-atomic > > More generally: do folks have a short and medium term plan here? > > After briefly chatting with Josh at RH summit, the short term goal is 'build > Atomic Host for AArch64'. > Following that, I guess there might be some work to make Atomic Registry 'do > the right thing'? And orchestration 'do the right thing'? > > Best regards, > Richard > > 1. > http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2014/04/build-your-own-atomic-host-on-fedora-20/ > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. >
