Agreed. Lets not address anyone mad. But I guess addressing Suki as 
"Suckwinder" would be good enough :).

Swamy (aka Kitcha)

--- In [email protected], V S Rawat <vsra...@...> wrote:
>
> If someone is finding everyone mad, one possibility is that everybody 
> is not mad and this person should get himself checked up whether he 
> himself might be.
> 
> It is sickening to the soul to see that we are uttering such biased 
> statement undermining everybody. Anyone who speaks good of ARR 
> instantly become intelligent, caring, creative, considerate and what 
> not, and anyone uttering any word that doesn't go well with ARR's 
> repute in our mind, that person instantly become loser, mad, 
> opportunist, politician, envious, publicity monger and what not.
> 
> This list has seen many ups and lows in 11 years, but this phase seems 
> to be the lowest ever when we fans are acting like narcissus not able 
> to see and appreciate anyone's view point. I hope better sense will 
> prevail soon.
> 
> I condemn anyone calling anyone mad. If we can't respect one artist 
> and one human, it is quite likely that we don't at all know what 
> respect is, and our claims of respecting someone else have to be fake.
> 
> --
> Rawat
> 
> On 9/9/2010 9:14 AM India Time, _A.R.Rajib_ wrote:
> 
> > Thanks a ton for the link bro !!!
> >
> > *For the Jai Ho Song the Option given to the Fans was "The jai ho song
> > was sung by Sukwinder,even though it is popular as a A.R.Rahman's
> > Song....How does Sukwinder react on this matter ? "*
> > *
> > *
> > *The option was ...*
> > *
> > *
> > *A. After getting the Oscar A.R.Rahman dint give equal honor to the singer*
> > *B. The singer got enough honor as he deserves*
> > *C.There is grudge ,but he dont wanna say anything in public*
> >
> > I just hope i dont have to translate the hindi by Sukwinder ! The guy is
> > mad !! Dont know from where he got the 2nd time ..jai ho wasnt performed
> > on Grammys :s He needs to get his facts correct !!
> >
> > I dont know why this particular show only invited same kind of people
> > ...Kumar shanu , Bappi Lahiri , Pritam , Sukwinder , Abhijeet , Manna
> > dey ..U know what i mean !! All these people's character are kind of
> > similar :s
> >
> > people Watch the video ..hear it from the person's mouth itself !!
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Arijit Debnath <arijit...@...
> > <mailto:arijit...@...>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >     Rajib,
> >     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XfG2dulp8w&feature=related
> >     <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XfG2dulp8w&feature=related>
> >     Arijit
> >
> >     On 7 September 2010 10:19, A.R.Rajib <a.r.ra...@...
> >     <mailto:a.r.ra...@...>> wrote:
> >
> >         Oh...i missed that Episode :-( Is there any re-telecast of this
> >         ? Can record and upload the same :-) Watched Bappi lahiri,Kumar
> >         shanu,Manna dey,Pritam and other episodes just to listen if they
> >         comment anything about ARR !!
> >
> >
> >         On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Arijit Debnath
> >         <arijit...@... <mailto:arijit...@...>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >             because he is not aware how to apply for visa in proper time
> >             and get it... further more he is bad mouthing ARRahman.
> >             In a Bengali show "Ke Hobe Biggest Fan?" (who will be the
> >             biggest fan?).. he conveyed something like below:
> >             *************He doesn't have any regrets for not being at
> >             oscars...but his only regret is that at Oscars in background
> >             his voice was playing but two ladies were doing lip
> >             syncing..... that's a shame.....*************
> >             See how baseless allegation he put against Rahman.
> >             Arijit
> >
> >
> >             On 4 September 2010 13:43, Thulasi Ram <karoke...@...
> >             <mailto:karoke...@...>> wrote:
> >
> >                 can anyone please summarize why sukhwinder was not part
> >                 of oscar and grammies, when gulzar, tanvi and vijay
> >                 prakash were part of it?
> >
> >
> >                 thanks.
> >
>


Reply via email to