Merely revoking the ROAs wouldn’t do much in most cases as ROA non-existent doesn’t usually result in route rejection.
OTOH, ARIN theoretically could remap their ROAs to AS0 which would have a severe impact. NOTE: I’m not saying this is a good Idea, merely pointing out the details of what would be necessary. Owen > On Aug 29, 2025, at 13:52, David Conrad via ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Aug 29, 2025, at 1:05 PM, Aaron Wendel <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm not sure how ARIN would enforce this anyway since they have no hand in >> routing policy or routing on the operational level. > > Violators have their ROAs revoked? > > (Not a serious suggestion, just an observation that the assertion that ARIN > has “no hand in routing policy or routing on the operational level” is no > longer necessarily true) > > Regards, > -drc > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
