That's actually a very good and valid point ! Thanks for bringing it up Noah.

Fernando

On 11/07/2025 16:12, Noah wrote:
It's not a good policy. If individuals want to become members of an RIR, that is fine.

But when it comes to Internet Number Resources which we have seen some claim to be properties or a commodity, this will create a precedent where persons claim IP  addresses as personal property or part of their estate or assets. They will then advance into courts to make claims and the judges who do not have an idea how the RIR system works will defend their property rights.

Cheers,
*.**/noah*
*
*


On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 9:44 PM Douglas Camin <[email protected]> wrote:

    Scott -

    I think the intent is to suggest that the community first focus on
    the merits of the policy ahead the costs. This does not mean cost
    is never a consideration, but at this juncture - this draft policy
    is brand new and only received an early staff and legal because of
    its legal implications - the questions to the community revolve
    around “is this good policy or not."
    Hope that helps -


    Doug

    --

    Douglas J. Camin

    [email protected]

    *From: *Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
    *Date: *Friday, July 11, 2025 at 1:31 PM
    *To: *arin-ppml <[email protected]>, Douglas Camin
    <[email protected]>
    *Subject: *Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2025-4: Resource Issuance to
    Natural Persons -- Request for Feedback

    I wholeheartedly disagree. If the benefits of the policy change
    don’t exceed the costs, it’s not good policy. I’m not convinced we
    haven’t already wasted more of our collective time discussing this
    policy than will ever be saved by the small number of individuals
    who’d benefit from it (those who can’t easily apply as sole
    proprietors).

    -Scott
    On Jul 11, 2025 at 9:43 AM -0700, Douglas Camin
    <[email protected]>, wrote:

        Xavier -
        Appreciate the feedback and question. When considering policy,
        it’s encouraged to consider the policy exclusively on the
        merits and not on cost. If it’s good policy, it should be
        implemented and if not, it should be abandoned. This keeps us
        focused on whether policy is sound or not. A sound policy can
        be expensive, and an unsound one can be cheap.
        Hope that helps, though I know it doesn’t directly answer your
        question - we’d love to get your feedback on your views on
        what we should do with the policy.
        Thanks!
        Doug
        --
        Douglas J. Camin
        ARIN Advisory Council
        [email protected]
        *From:* ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> on behalf of
        Xavier via ARIN-PPML <[email protected]>
        *Date:* Thursday, July 10, 2025 at 8:33 PM
        *To:* Elizabeth Goodson <[email protected]>
        *Cc:* [email protected] <[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2025-4: Resource Issuance to
        Natural Persons -- Request for Feedback

        My feedback on this policy depends on what the "implementation
        cost" (referenced in the last paragraph of the Legal Review
        section) will be. Making it easier to access resources is
        probably worth $10,000 but is probably not worth $250,000,
        IMO. Do we have a ballpark estimate?

        Thank you,
        Xavier Clark
        On Thursday, July 10th, 2025 at 7:27 PM, Elizabeth Goodson
        <[email protected]> wrote:

            Hello PPML,

            I'm shepherding this policy along with Doug Camin. We're
            seeking direction from the community as to how the AC
            should proceed with this policy. There was robust
            conversation on PPML in late May and early June, which
            tapered off quickly after the ARIN Staff and Legal
            analysis was published.

            
https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2025_4/#staff-and-legal-review-3-june-2025

            Should we
            - abandon this policy,
            - accept this policy as written, or
            - continue to revise this policy?
            We appreciate your feedback.
            Thanks,
            Liz Goodson

        _______________________________________________
        ARIN-PPML
        You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
        the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
        Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
        https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
        Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

    _______________________________________________
    ARIN-PPML
    You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
    the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
    Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
    https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
    Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.


_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to