For ISPs a /22 is billed at XX-small at $500 annually. (this includes ASNs and membership vote)
adding up to a /40 keeps the ISP in the XX-small category and does not change the annual fee. An IPv4 /32 bumps the ISP up to a small with an annual fee of $2,000. (a $1,500 increase). (If the ISP already had more than a /20 there would be no increase in fees) End sites are billed differently End sites pay $100 per resource. one /22 costs $100. two /24s cost $200. one /20, two /23s, and two ASNs cost $500 annually. There is an additional one time fee for new resources based on the size of the resource. So an end user with one /22 and one ASN the annual fee is $200. There is a one time initial fee of of $500 for a single block that is a /40 or smaller (this is in addition to the $200 annual fee for IPv4 and ASN) The following year the annual fee will go up by $100 for a total of $300. ___Jason On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:35 PM, David Huberman < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Josh, > > > > If you have a /21 allocation from ARIN, then you are paying them $1,000 a > year in a subscription fee. That covers your AS number, and your /21, and > it gives you membership to vote. > > > > If you want, you can request a /36 of IPv6 from ARIN, and it will come at > no extra charge. There will be no registration fee, and your annual > subscription fee will not change. > > > > From an engineering perspective, many of us do not recommend that. We > recommend getting the full default prefix size – a /32 – and deploying > that. Unfortunately, that will cause your annual subscription fee with > ARIN to double to $2,000. You still won’t pay a registration fee for > getting the /32, but when your next annual bill is sent, it will be for > $2,000 rather than $1,000. > > > > Please keep in mind that the only realistic way I know of to get more IPv4 > addresses for your new products and customers is via the IPv4 transfer > market, and that’s going to cost many, many times more than ARIN charges. > Many tens of thousands of dollars, probably, depending on what you want to > get. You may wish to balance the cost of obtaining more IPv4 addresses in > the market with what revenue opportunities those addresses represent, then > factor in how you can (or cannot) leverage IPv6 to make those numbers work > better for you. Just a suggestion, and sorry if I’m overstepping. > > > > David > > > > *David R Huberman* > Principal, Global IP Addressing > > Microsoft Corporation > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *[email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 11, 2015 7:29 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] Automatic IPv6 Eligibility > > > > Well here's my scenario. My ISP is in the process of acquiring another > ISP, I wrote into arin for advice of how to go about requesting additional > ip space as the acquisition will take more IP addresses then what we have > left out of our current /21 allotment. > > > I was advised to apply asap however with the depletion > procedures/protocols it didn't seem likely to quickly be able to get enough > blocks from the free pool. > > If an existing service provider such as myself would be able to get a free > ipv6 allocation I would agree it would help transition to ipv6 faster as I > need more IPs for my customers, infrastructure, etc. > > I'd at least be more willing to try to make it work for my customer ip > space since there would be little or no cost involved, now the problem that > remains is the equipment compatibility and third party support of ipv6. > > Is it possible to still get a block to use for my ISP for $100/yr? > > Best Regards, > Josh Rowe > > On August 11, 2015 10:11:40 PM EDT, Randy Carpenter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > ----- On Aug 11, 2015, at 8:43 PM, Seth Mattinen [email protected] wrote: > > On 8/11/15 14:43, Alfie Cleveland wrote: > > Hello, > > I’m requesting comment in regards to automatically make organisations > eligible for IPv6 if they hold justified IPv4 space. This similar to > Section 9.3.1. of the [APNIC-127] APNIC Internet Number Resource > Policies. I feel that if organisations were able to receive a /48 for > each /24 they hold, then it would help expedite the rollout of IPv6. > Organisations currently have two choices - continue to use IPv4, or > spend valuable time on applying for IPv6 space. IPv6 space is clearly in > abundance - and this could potentially help slo > > w the > > exhaustion of IPv4. > > > > > I got my /32 IPv6 allocation in late 2009 and end user /48 in 2007 and I > don't remember having to do much to qualify for them other than ask. Has > this changed? > > > No. If you have IPv4 space already, it is incredibly easy to get IPv6. > Getting the default /48 as an end-user is about as automatic as it could be, > and qualifying for more is not much more effort if you have multiple sites. > > The only issue is that for end-users, you now have to pay an additional $100 > per year for the IPv6 assignment. > > -Randy > > ------------------------------ > > > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2flists.arin.net%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2farin-ppml&data=01%7c01%7cdavid.huberman%40microsoft.com%7cda43505669344383a23b08d2a2bdd610%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=8tB7qrXRyzQxkxErQNddayFfecqCmrp54AhlO7IzCkE%3d> > Please contact [email protected] if you experi > > ence > > any issues. > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > -- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|[email protected]|571-266-0006
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
