I would support. Owen
On Apr 30, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Jeffrey Lyon <[email protected]> wrote: > Friends, Colleagues, > > A couple of years ago I brought up an issue I had run into where the > utilization requirement for new requests is being calculated on a per > allocation basis rather than in aggregate. For example, if an > organization has 4 x /22 and 3 of them are utilized 100% and the > fourth utilized at 75%, that request would be denied. This is a bit > out of balance as an organization with a single /20 utilized at 80% > would have less efficient utilization but would be eligible to request > additional space. > > The last time this was discussed it sounded as if the community would > support a policy proposal to change this calculation to be considered > in aggregate vs. per assignment. Does this remain the case? > > Thanks, > -- > Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP > Fellow, Black Lotus Communications > mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: [email protected] | skype: blacklotus.net > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
