Galle wrote, in part:
> > the second step could plausibly be parsed as "if they have more than
> > 4000 pyrite, *instead* destroy all but 4000 pyrite".)
> <snip>
> That is a good point.
>
> I withdraw the proposal "The Pyrite Preservation Proposal."
>
> I submit the following proposal, entitled "The Pyrite Preservation Proposal
> v2", with adoption index 1.5:
> ===
> Amend Rule 2711 ("Outshining the Sun") by replacing the following text:
> ---
> * All Pyrite is destroyed.
> ---
> With the following text:
> ---
> * All Pyrite in eir possession is destroyed.
> * Half of all Pyrite in each other player's possession, rounded up, is
> destroyed.
> * For each player with more than 4000 Pyrite, all but 4000 Pyrite in their
> possession is destroyed.
Still sounds a bit like alternatives, as otherwise there's no need for
"other" (it could say "in each player's possession").
All the best,
msh210
