> On Jun 7, 2026, at 5:05 PM, msh210 via agora-discussion > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Salad wrote, in part: >> Under the current rules, as I understand them, a person may create a >> Scheduled Action on behalf of some player. Rule 2716 then causes that >> player to perform the Payload as emself > > My recent mistake ( > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg57919.html > ) shows that one _cannot_ create a scheduled action on behalf of > someone else, since there's no rule allowing one to do so. Am I > missing something (again)? > > But the rest of this message assumes one (A) _can_ create a scheduled > action on behalf of another (B). > > I don't see that the action taken would be by B as emself. The rule > says that the scheduled action's "creator [presumably B] performs > actions as if e had published its Payload at that time" of the > trigger. Even so, it's not clear to me that B performs actions as if > e had published the payload _on eir own behalf_ at that time. The > rule doesn't certainly say so. Quite possibly, the rule means that B > performs actions as if e had published the payload _via agent A_ at > that time. (Of course, that's what you're protoproposing anyway, so > it sounds good to me. I'm just saying I'm not convinced it's > necessary.) > > Yours truly, > > msh210
No rule currently specifically enables anyone to create Scheduled Actions on someone else's behalf, but a Contract could permit it. - Galle
