> On Mar 25, 2026, at 9:25 PM, Mischief via agora-discussion > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 3/25/26 7:44 AM, Gregory Hayes via agora-business wrote: >> I submit the following proposal, entitled "Campaign Promises", with an AI of >> 2: >> === >> Amend the first paragraph of Rule 2630, "The Administrative State", to read >> as follows: >> --- >> Each officer CAN, with 1.5 Agoran consent, enact, amend, or repeal eir own >> office's Administrative Regulations. Administrative Regulations have the >> following properties: >> --- >> Enact a new power 2 rule, entitled "Platforms", with the following text: >> --- >> A candidate in an election CAN, with notice, designate a public document as >> eir Platform for that election. A Platform SHOULD specify changes to the >> Administrative Regulations for the office being elected. >> When a candidate is elected to an office, if e has a Platform for that >> election, any changes to that office's Administrative Regulations specified >> by eir most recent Platform take effect. >> --- >> === >> This is fairly straightforward - it's a way for a candidate in an election >> to commit to a specific slate of Administrative Regulations in advance, so >> that the voters can know for sure exactly what they're getting and how their >> chosen candidate intends to conduct emself in office. >> - Galle > > > > Winning an Election is more akin to 1.0 Agoran Consent, so it's effectively a > lower bar. I'm not opposed (overall I'm leaning toward supporting this > proposal) but thought it was worth highlighting > > -- > Mischief > Collar, Collector, Executor > Hat: sleeping cap
It is a lower bar for implementing administrative regulations, but a higher bar for repealing them - at the moment, Rule 2630 allows new electees to repeal their administrative regulations by announcement. Since administrative regulations only bind the officer, not other players, I think it's fine if they're easier for the officer to enact than to repeal.
