On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:13 AM nix via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >> Amend R2642, "Gathering Stones", to read in full: > >> > >> Grab Cost is an integer stone switch with default value 10, tracked > >> by the Stonemason. At the beginning of each week, the Grab Cost of > >> each Stone is decreased by 1, unless it is already 0. > >> > >> A player CAN "grab" a specified, non-immune stone by paying a fee of > >> X Stone Stamps, where X is the Stone's current Grab Cost. When e > >> does so, the specified stone is transferred to em and its Grab Cost > >> is set to 10. > >> > > Because 2642 is a different rule than 2640, 2640 is using the definition > of > > fixed from 2577. I think this means that stones are non-transferrable, > > since it would not be defined in its backing document (2640), and 2577 > has > > higher power than 2642? I think this also applies to weilding stones, > > however, I'm not certain because would R2645 be the backing document, and > > thus, defined methods of transfer? > > I think what you're saying is that you think transferring by grabbing > doesn't work, because R2642 cannot override the definition in R2640 > (because only the backing document can). I'm actually not sure. I can > move things around if necessary, but I'll ask for some clarification first. > > -- > nix > > ah, sorry, I did mention it before. If I'm the only one noticing, then it probably just magically *works* (at least, until someone points it out) Which is like... perfect, so no need to change it. :D -- 4ˢᵗ Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
