On 11/22/23 17:52, nix via agora-discussion wrote: > On 11/22/23 16:48, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: >> On 11/22/23 17:38, nix via agora-discussion wrote: >>>>> If no player has won by victory tokens in 3 months, the player with >>>>> the most victory tokens CAN win by announcement. >>>>> >>>>> Enact a new rule titled "Stamps for Strength": >>>>> >>>>> A player CAN pay three stamps with the "Strength" stamp >>>>> specialization. Eir Voting Strength is increased by 2 on all >>>>> ordinary referenda currently being voted on. >>>> There should be a named action here (like for the Power Stone). Also, I >>>> continue to believe that instantaneous voting strength changes do nothing. >>> It seems to work for other such clauses, or at least we've been playing >>> as such. >>> >> What other such clauses? We don't have any in the rules to my knowledge >> (and haven't for at least a little while). >> > R2632: > > For each office a player holds, eir voting strength is increase > by the complexity of the office for referenda on ordinary > proposals, up to a maximum increase of 3 by this method. > > Am I missing something? it's the exact same phrasing (plus a typo). >
Slight difference: that's phrased continuously. "While this condition is true, apply this effect" vs "When this event occurs, apply this effect". I guess it doesn't actually need a separate action: "Eir voting strength is increased by two for a referendum on an ordinary proposal for each time e did so in the voting period." would be fine I think (and mirrors that example)? -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
