- Alright, I could replace it with "Winnor Winnor".
- I appreciate the feedback but, why?
- Unfortunately this isn't evident to me either. Why?
On Thursday, March 16, 2023, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/16/23 18:18, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I'd like to try out and practice Proposal-making with something modest.
> I'd
> > greatly appreciate feedback.
> >
> >
> > Title: Chicken Dinner
> >
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> >
> > Author: Yachay
> >
> > Coauthors:
> >
> > Body:
> >
> > {
> >
> > Create a new Power 1.0 rule that says:
> >
> >
> > "If this rule has existed in the Ruleset for 7 days or more, then any
> > Player may perform a Chicken Dinner by announcement, if it has never been
> > performed previously. When a Chicken Dinner is performed, then a player
> > becomes the Winner Winner, that player being the active player in the
> n-th
> > place in an ordered list of all active players ordered by their date of
> > first registration (Starting at 1 and the oldest-registered player, the
> > next-oldest being 2, and so on), being n the first number in the "3
> NUMBERS
> > FROM 1 TO 50" section of https://avkg.com/en/daily-random/. If there
> would
> > be no active player in that n-th place, then the Chicken Dinner action
> > CANNOT be performed. The message containing the Chicken Dinner MUST also
> > unambiguously have stated the ordered list mentioned, and the "Daily
> > Random" number corresponding to that Agoran day.
> >
> >
> > Upon becoming the Winner Winner, that player gains 3 stamps of their own
> > type.
> >
> >
> > The Winner Winner does not win the game through any manner stated in this
> > rule.
> >
> > }
>
>
> Regardless of mechanics, I would strongly prefer to avoid "Winner
> Winner" here.
>
> Don't use a website, just use the standard random choice mechanism.
>
> Don't use a "MUST" to impose effectiveness requirements upon an action.
>
> --
> Janet Cobb
>
> Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
>
>
