On 9/26/21 21:16, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > On 9/26/2021 5:55 PM, Telna via agora-discussion wrote: >> On 2021-09-27 07:00, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: >>> Telna wrote: >>>> (and of course, while the idea of us permanently living in the shadow >>>> of a rule that claims absolute authority over us forever and nothing >>>> else is rather hilarious although of course not the goal here, AIAN >>>> should prevent such a rule from being enacted given the proposal that >>>> would be doing the enacting would only exist at Power 3) >>> Only if it would otherwise ossify Agora, which this example at least >>> wouldn't (should be able to nerf it by amending R1030 so that that >>> particular rule's Power no longer causes it to win rule conflicts). >> The phrase "arbitrary proposals" in AIAN means that ANY permanent >> limitation on what a proposal can do ossifies Agora, since then your >> proposals can't be truly arbitrary anymore. >> > Wait does that mean the don't ossify Agora rule has ossified Agora? > > If so, Agora is ossified, and since it can't become ossified again, that > rule can't prevent anything from being ossified further? > > [The real answer is, I'm guessing, that a "any reasonable combination of > actions" could include a proposal that repeals the ossification rule, that > we time to take effect before the "arbitrary" proposal takes effect. So > as long as both proposals could go through, we're fine.] > > -G. >
Yep. See CFJs 3765 and 3766. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
