Telna wrote:
This goes to another thing I'm curious about: The Rule that allows higher-powered Rules to override lower-powered Rules only itself exists at Power 3.3 and it seems reasonable that this clause can't be used to override rules of higher power than that (by its own application!), leaving the interpretation unclear. At that point, doesn't it come down to CFJ anyway?
Probably, especially since you'd have to find a way for a higher-power rule to conflict with R1030 on something other than how rule precedence is determined, which would cause the last paragraph of R1030 to prevent that conflict from coming into existence in the first place. (Unless the last paragraph of R1030 is removed first, in which case it clearly becomes possible to create things like Andre's paradox.)
(and of course, while the idea of us permanently living in the shadow of a rule that claims absolute authority over us forever and nothing else is rather hilarious although of course not the goal here, AIAN should prevent such a rule from being enacted given the proposal that would be doing the enacting would only exist at Power 3)
Only if it would otherwise ossify Agora, which this example at least wouldn't (should be able to nerf it by amending R1030 so that that particular rule's Power no longer causes it to win rule conflicts).
