On 7/2/21 11:55 PM, Aris via agora-discussion wrote: > I don't know if I'd vote FOR it with that change, but it could be > interesting as a way of incentivising ruleset simplification. I'd have > to reflect on whether I think ruleset simplification is a good thing. > I certainly wouldn't like us to start, say, repealing all the asset > rules, or something. For that reason, I think I might vote AGAINST or > PRESENT even with the changes.
I'm AGAINST this; we already have Tapecutter. I don't think an additional material reward is necessary. > Also, it might be worth adding this to the list in Rule 2496. That way > we could make it the responsibility of either the Assessor or the > Rulekeepor to do. Jason would need to comment on which one would be > appropriate. Rulekeepor would be more appropriate, in my opinion. For me, philosophically, the Assessor shouldn't need to look at the text of proposals at all. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
