Here's my draft. I was going to try to send it in earlier, but the
week was a bit of a mess (a lot of them seem to be lately) and it
didn't happen.
-Aris
---
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 7, the voting method is AI-majority, and the
valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
conditional votes).
ID Author(s) AI Title
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8490* Jason 3.0 Functional Emergency Regulations
8491#^ ATMunn 2.0 Minor Speaker fix
8492*^ Jason 3.0 Unscoped RWO
The proposal pool contains the following proposals:
Author(s) AI Title
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
R. Lee 1.0 why are we passing these
Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal.
<ID># : Ordinary proposal, unset chamber.
<ID>e : Economy ministry proposal.
<ID>f : Efficiency ministry proposal.
<ID>j : Justice ministry proposal.
<ID>l : Legislation ministry proposal.
<ID>p : Participation ministry proposal.
<ID>^ : Sponsored proposal.
The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where
the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
the information shown above shall control.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8490
Title: Functional Emergency Regulations
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Jason
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 2614 by appending the following sentence to the paragraph
beginning "The Prime Minister CAN, in an emergency message and with 3
Agoran consent": "To the extent explicitly permitted by this rule,
Emergency Regulations are always taking effect."
[Right now, Emergency Regulations CAN do some stuff, but they never
actually take effect to do it.]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8491
Title: Minor Speaker fix
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: ATMunn
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 103 "The Speaker" by appending the following sentence to
the paragraph beginning "If the office of Speaker has been held
continuously":
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the Speaker CANNOT object to
an intent by any player to do so.
[Explanation: Currently, if the Speaker has been Speaker for at least
90 days, e can be replaced with support. However, the Speaker has
the power to stop any intent, even one that is with support, by
objecting to it. This would mean that the Speaker cannot be removed by
this method. The office can still be reappointed by the Prime Minister
if another player wins the game, but as is, the 90+ days method is
relatively obsolete. The fix is to either remove the feature
altogether or fix it, and I think it's a nice feature, so I proposed
this fix. I've also just managed to make an explanation about 3 times
as long as the actual proposal. Oops.]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8491
Title: Unscoped RWO
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Jason
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 2202 by replacing the paragraph beginning "A player CAN" with
the following: "A player CAN, without objection, ratify a specified
public document."
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Title: why are we passing these
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: R. Lee
Co-authors:
If R. Lee has published a doument to the public forum labelled DOING STUFF
before the end of the voting period of this proposal, make the changes
specified in that document.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
