Im sorry, the title is  why are we passing these

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 5:55 PM N. S. <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> COE (unofficial of course): The proposal pool is missing my proposal
> entitled something like "can you do this every week" (the scam one)
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:16 AM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> Here's my weekly draft.
>>
>> -Aris
>> ---
>> PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW
>>
>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
>> and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote
>> collector
>> is the Assessor, the quorum is 6, the voting method is AI-majority, and
>> the
>> valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
>> conditional votes).
>>
>> ID      Author(s)                AI    Title
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 8488*^  Falsifian, Jason, omd    3.0   Empty the escalator v1
>>
>> Interesting economics
>>
>> Author(s)                AI    Title
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Jason, Trigon            1.0   Interesting economics
>> Jason                    3.0   Unscoped RWO
>> Jason                    3.0   Functional Emergency Regulations
>>
>>
>> Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal.
>>         <ID># : Ordinary proposal, unset chamber.
>>         <ID>e : Economy ministry proposal.
>>         <ID>f : Efficiency ministry proposal.
>>         <ID>j : Justice ministry proposal.
>>         <ID>l : Legislation ministry proposal.
>>         <ID>p : Participation ministry proposal.
>>         <ID>^ : Sponsored proposal.
>>
>> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where
>> the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
>> the information shown above shall control.
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ID: 8488
>> Title: Empty the escalator v1
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>> Author: Falsifian
>> Co-authors: Jason, omd
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule 2577 by adding the sentence "Attempts to destroy no assets
>> are successful." before the sentence that begins "An indestructible
>> asset".
>>
>> Amend Rule 2577 by adding the sentence "Attempts to transfer no assets
>> are successful." before the sentence that begins "A fixed asset".
>>
>> Amend Rule 2579 by deleting the paragraph that ends with "0 or empty fee".
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> Title: Interesting economics
>> Adoption index: 1.0
>> Author: Jason
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule 2624 by appending the following sentence to the first
>> paragraph: "The type of card with the fewest existing instances is
>> associated with the Ministry of Economy."
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> Title: Unscoped RWO
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>> Author: Jason
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule 2202 by replacing the paragraph beginning "A player CAN" with
>> the following: "A player CAN, without objection, ratify a specified
>> public document."
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> Title: Functional Emergency Regulations
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>> Author: Jason
>> Co-authors:
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule 2614 by appending the following sentence to the paragraph
>> beginning "The Prime Minister CAN, in an emergency message and with 3
>> Agoran consent": "To the extent explicitly permitted by this rule,
>> Emergency Regulations are always taking effect."
>>
>> [Right now, Emergency Regulations CAN do some stuff, but they never
>> actually take effect to do it.]
>>
>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>
>
>
> --
> From R. Lee
>


-- 
>From R. Lee

Reply via email to