On 7/30/20 2:46 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> I CFJ: { Jason is not an interested judge. }
>
> EVIDENCE
>
> Proposal 7899 (Oct 2017) appended the following to rule 991 (calls for
> judgement):
>
> {
> The Arbitor's weekly report includes a summary of recent
> judicial case activity, including open and recently-judged
> cases, recent judicial assignments, and a list of players
> interested in judging.
> }
>
> That text is still there, unchanged, in the current 991/33.
>
> Rule 2125/12 reads (in part):
> {
> An action is regulated by a body of law if […] (3) it would, as part of its
> effect, modify information for which some person bound by that body of law is
> required, by that body of law, to be a recordkeepor.
>
> If a body of law regulates an action, then to the extent that doing so is
> within its scope, that body of law prevents the action from being performed
> except as described within it, including by limiting the methods to perform
> that action to those specified within it. […]
> }
>
> ARGUMENTS
>
> “Recordkeepor” is defined by the rules only in the context of assets, but it
> seems fairly obvious to parse this as “information… for which some person
> bound by that body of law is required to include in eir report.” Therefore,
> becoming interested in judging is a regulated action. Therefore, one can only
> become an interested judge except as described by the rules, which provide no
> mechanism to do so. Jason registered in Jun 2019, after Oct 2017 when
> interested judgeship became a regulated action. Therefore, there is no way ey
> could have become a interested judge.
>
> Gaelan
Oh no! My Agoran life is flashing before my eyes! I... I.. need to lie down.
--
Jason Cobb
