Nothing personal, you were just the first Agoran in the judge list who I was
pretty sure was post 2017.
Gaelan
> On Jul 30, 2020, at 11:48 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/30/20 2:46 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>> I CFJ: { Jason is not an interested judge. }
>>
>> EVIDENCE
>>
>> Proposal 7899 (Oct 2017) appended the following to rule 991 (calls for
>> judgement):
>>
>> {
>> The Arbitor's weekly report includes a summary of recent
>> judicial case activity, including open and recently-judged
>> cases, recent judicial assignments, and a list of players
>> interested in judging.
>> }
>>
>> That text is still there, unchanged, in the current 991/33.
>>
>> Rule 2125/12 reads (in part):
>> {
>> An action is regulated by a body of law if […] (3) it would, as part of its
>> effect, modify information for which some person bound by that body of law
>> is required, by that body of law, to be a recordkeepor.
>>
>> If a body of law regulates an action, then to the extent that doing so is
>> within its scope, that body of law prevents the action from being performed
>> except as described within it, including by limiting the methods to perform
>> that action to those specified within it. […]
>> }
>>
>> ARGUMENTS
>>
>> “Recordkeepor” is defined by the rules only in the context of assets, but it
>> seems fairly obvious to parse this as “information… for which some person
>> bound by that body of law is required to include in eir report.” Therefore,
>> becoming interested in judging is a regulated action. Therefore, one can
>> only become an interested judge except as described by the rules, which
>> provide no mechanism to do so. Jason registered in Jun 2019, after Oct 2017
>> when interested judgeship became a regulated action. Therefore, there is no
>> way ey could have become a interested judge.
>>
>> Gaelan
>
>
> Oh no! My Agoran life is flashing before my eyes! I... I.. need to lie down.
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
>
