On 6/27/20 2:11 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:29 PM nch via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> On 6/25/20 6:40 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: >>> Title: Regulatory Instruments v2 >>> Author: Jason >>> Coauthors: Aris >>> Adoption index: 3.0 >> Reading this it seems mechanically sound. However I kind of agree with >> G. Were there any specific deficits with the current regulation system >> that have affected gameplay negatively? Do we need the extra protections >> offered by bodies of law? > > The underlying premise of bodies of law is that it makes sense to have > rules, regulations, and probably also contracts follow the same basic > framework. This unification in processing was thought to be inherently > beneficial. It's something we have been discussing for a while. > > That being said, if this adds complexity... Maybe we should reconsider the > whole project? Maybe these systems simply shouldn't be unified? > > Jason, I know you've been working on this for quite a while. You've been > doing a lot of good stuff and the results are quite impressive. And I > honestly don't like suggesting that we not use so much good thoughtful > work.
Eh, no big deal. it wasn't too much work (certainly much less than talismans). > That being said, people's comments here have made me wonder whether this > entire affair was a good idea. Bodies of Law made the ruleset more > complicated. At the time I was concerned about the complexity but thought > the eventual uniformity that would result would make it all worth it. It's > starting to feel like maybe I should have listened to my gut and argued > against it. > > -Aris I don't really mind the bodies of law system, although I understand why people dislike it. Just, if the proposal is going to fail, I won't bother pending it and making the lives of everyone who has to deal with it harder. -- Jason Cobb
