On 6/13/20 9:18 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: >> Rule 2595 requires that "[the initiator] published an announcement of >> intent that unambiguously, clearly, conspicuously, and without >> obfuscation specified the action to be taken and the method(s) to be >> used". If the parameters can only be evaluated at the time of resolution >> and not at the time of initiation, the specification arguably does not >> meet that standard. >> >> -- >> Jason Cobb >> > Which part of those standards do you feel it doesn't meet?
If the set of coins that could potentially be transferred by the intent can be changed by the time of resolution, I would say that it's not even "clear" which coins the intent specifies, because, ultimately a set of assets has to be selected to be transferred from L&FD under Rule 2576, and the intent has to "unambiguously, clearly, conspicuously, and without obfuscation" specify those assets. If the reference is floating, then it could come to potentially include any coin in the game, which I feel isn't a "clear" specification of the assets to be transferred. Of course, I don't have any other rule text then what I've cited so far for my argument, and I haven't conducted a thorough (or any) search of the archives for this, so I could be missing something glaringly obvious. -- Jason Cobb
