On 6/13/20 8:16 PM, Rebecca via agora-business wrote: >> No, that's not right. It is calculated from the time of the resolution of > the intent, not the intent itself. > > I do intend to transfer a victory card and also intend to transfer a > legislative card from the Lost and Found Department to myself, both without > objection.
I know that coins are fungible, but let's consider if they weren't for a second. Assume L&FD had 3 coins: Coin A, Coin B, and Coin C, and I said "I intend, without objection, to transfer each coin owned by the L&FD to myself". I think that I would clearly have only given intents for Coins A, B, and C, even if Coin D was later transferred to L&FD, because Coin D wasn't a "coin owned by the L&FD" at the time of the intent. You're suggesting that the parameters to the actions are evaluated at the time the intent is resolved. Consider if the Registrar said "I intend, with notice, to deregister the person I have most recently designated as 'The One To Be Deregistered'." I think everyone would have a problem with that - the parameters to the action are arguably part of specifying the action itself. Rule 2595 requires that "[the initiator] published an announcement of intent that unambiguously, clearly, conspicuously, and without obfuscation specified the action to be taken and the method(s) to be used". If the parameters can only be evaluated at the time of resolution and not at the time of initiation, the specification arguably does not meet that standard. -- Jason Cobb
