Naw when I wrote that I was picturing this one:
http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/tim-and-eric-mind-blown.gif

On 6/12/2020 10:04 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> tfw you transcend logic  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwmeH6Rnj2E
> 
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:53 PM James Cook via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 22:24, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>>> On 6/11/2020 2:48 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>> On 6/11/20 3:29 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I submit the following proposal, "win indirection", AI-1:
>>>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Amend Rule 2553 (Win by Paradox) by replacing:
>>>>>
>>>>>     that case's initiator CAN, by announcement, win the game.
>>>>>
>>>>> with:
>>>>>
>>>>>     that case's initiator, CAN, by announcement, Transcend Logic.
>> When
>>>>>     a person transcends logic, e wins the game.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [This should make all wins in the rules indirect:  Ribbons,
>>>>> Tournaments, and Apathy are indirect already]
>>>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately I think Sets breaks this style.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yah I figured a Sets win was at least a month away (I hope!) so there
>>> would be time - was thinking about the "proposals for a not-even-adopted
>>> yet system" thing. :)
>>>
>>> But interestingly, if Falsifian's theory is correct, exactly 1 win method
>>> would be allowed to be "direct", which would stop any other "direct" win
>>> methods but still allow for indirect ones.  So even if it isn't changed,
>>> it's fine for now if the above proposal is adopted.
>>>
>>> -G.
>>
>> Sets uses "by announcement". As long as winning the game is not
>> associated with a fee anywhere in the rules, I don't see a problem.
>> Still, I support extending this proposal to Sets after it passes, in
>> case there still is a problem, and to keep a consistent style.
>>
>> - Falsifian
>>

Reply via email to