On 6/11/2020 2:48 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/11/20 3:29 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: >> >> I submit the following proposal, "win indirection", AI-1: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Amend Rule 2553 (Win by Paradox) by replacing: >> >> that case's initiator CAN, by announcement, win the game. >> >> with: >> >> that case's initiator, CAN, by announcement, Transcend Logic. When >> a person transcends logic, e wins the game. >> >> >> [This should make all wins in the rules indirect: Ribbons, >> Tournaments, and Apathy are indirect already] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> > Unfortunately I think Sets breaks this style. >
Yah I figured a Sets win was at least a month away (I hope!) so there would be time - was thinking about the "proposals for a not-even-adopted yet system" thing. :) But interestingly, if Falsifian's theory is correct, exactly 1 win method would be allowed to be "direct", which would stop any other "direct" win methods but still allow for indirect ones. So even if it isn't changed, it's fine for now if the above proposal is adopted. -G.
