tfw you transcend logic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwmeH6Rnj2E
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:53 PM James Cook via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 22:24, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 6/11/2020 2:48 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > > > On 6/11/20 3:29 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > > >> > > >> I submit the following proposal, "win indirection", AI-1: > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> Amend Rule 2553 (Win by Paradox) by replacing: > > >> > > >> that case's initiator CAN, by announcement, win the game. > > >> > > >> with: > > >> > > >> that case's initiator, CAN, by announcement, Transcend Logic. > When > > >> a person transcends logic, e wins the game. > > >> > > >> > > >> [This should make all wins in the rules indirect: Ribbons, > > >> Tournaments, and Apathy are indirect already] > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> > > >> > > > Unfortunately I think Sets breaks this style. > > > > > > > Yah I figured a Sets win was at least a month away (I hope!) so there > > would be time - was thinking about the "proposals for a not-even-adopted > > yet system" thing. :) > > > > But interestingly, if Falsifian's theory is correct, exactly 1 win method > > would be allowed to be "direct", which would stop any other "direct" win > > methods but still allow for indirect ones. So even if it isn't changed, > > it's fine for now if the above proposal is adopted. > > > > -G. > > Sets uses "by announcement". As long as winning the game is not > associated with a fee anywhere in the rules, I don't see a problem. > Still, I support extending this proposal to Sets after it passes, in > case there still is a problem, and to keep a consistent style. > > - Falsifian >
