On 5/22/20 4:28 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> First Proto for an auction overhaul (not really much shorter than current
> version should we golf this? :) )
>
> Auctions generally:
>
>      The Block is an entity. Any asset that CAN be owned by Agora CAN
>      be owned by the block.  A lot is a non-empty list of assets that
>      belong to the block.


How high of a power does this statement need to have to be effective? It
certainly works for all Rules-defined (since the Rules collectively have
mint authority), but it probably doesn't work for private assets, since
there's a power 3 statement that they can't be transferred outside of
the entities that can own them.


> Bidding
>
>      When an auction is initiated, its bidding period begins.  The bidding
>      period ends 7 days after its initiation, or if it began more than 96
>      hours ago and no bid has been placed or withdrawn in the last 96
>      hours.


I'm not sure I see the reason for having the 96 hour rule in the first
place.


>      A document purporting to be such a publication is a self-ratifying
>      attestation that (1) such an auction existed; (2) the indicated bids
>      were valid bids; and (3) the indicated bidders were assigned the
>      indicated lots.


Hmm... it doesn't look like self-ratification is currently secured,
which I can see both positives and negatives for.


>
>      Within a timely fashion after such a publication, an entity with an
>      assigned winning lot CAN and SHALL claim eir lot by paying a fee
>      equal to eir bid to transfer the items in eir assigned winning lot
>      from the block to emself.


This causes destruction of the bid, which breaks Free Auctions (if
that's something we want to keep).


> [
> TODO: what happens to exess lots?
> TODO: zombie auction compatibilty (totems?)
> ]


I think I'll write up a quick proto for Talismans (name stolen from
Warrigal).

-- 
Jason Cobb

Reply via email to