On 2/20/20 9:48 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > So if the 2017 definition of "contract" clearly did NOT include the Rules, > then (when the rules changed in 2018) there had to be a "moment of > becoming a contract" for the rules, presumably when the 2018 proposal was > adopted. However, making something a contract requires someone's explicit > consent - how was the consent given? You could say something like "well, > by the voting" but that doesn't sound like explicit consent to create a > contract to me. >
I would say that each consented to being bound by the rules of Agora when they became a player (assuming nobody became a player under coercion, or anything like that, which seems really unlikely), and, since they were still a player, had not actively revoked eir consent, so they arguably continued to consent to each incarnation of the rules afterwards. Additionally, the rules never say you have to consent to the agreement itself being a contract, so long as you consented to the agreement itself. > Also fun: the first clause of the 2018 proposal (8054) was: "Destroy all > contracts". > > -G. Ouch. So, does that cause the destruction of the rest of the contracts to fail, or just Agora? -- Jason Cobb
