On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 20:49, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 2/20/20 7:08 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > > So when R1742 was re-implemented (replacing R2520-2527), we still ended up > > with "Agora = agreement" and "contract = agreement" but the link "Agora = > > contract", while not inconsistent with the R1742 text, was never re-created. > > > > -G. > > > > I don't really buy this. My reading of the current rule is "if it's an > agreement, and it was made with the intention that it would be binding > upon the parties and governed by the rules, it's a contract". The > definition in the rules doesn't depend on whether something was a > contract in the past.
Are the rules necessarily governed by the rules in the sense of R1742?
