On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 10:43 PM Tanner Swett via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020, 01:05 omd via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > Hmm... Good point. It shouldn't be. The point was to clarify that > > even if the gamestate doesn't have a list of legal fictions, legal > > fictions can still exist due to rules (which are themselves part of > > the gamestate). > > > > Ah... so maybe your intention was to prevent rules from getting away with > stuff like "this rule is treated as though its power were 5"? > > For what it's worth, I like this language (even though it will certainly > never make it into Agora, for being too vague): > > A rule of lower power cannot enact, repeal, amend, override, subvert or > interfere with a rule of higher power.
We already have that, essentially? It's mostly in Rules 2140 and 1030, and secondarily in 217. -Aris
