‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 6:16 PM, James Cook <jc...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 23:27, Jason Cobb jason.e.c...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On 11/6/19 6:22 PM, James Cook wrote: > > > > > - Proposals 8253-8265 are resolved after further votes, except the H. > > > Assessor finds the decisions on Proposals 8257 and 8259 were not > > > initiated. > > > - Gaelan submits some arguments in favour of eir Proposal 8259 in > > > the > > > discussion thread: "In defense of 8259". > > > > > > - Error discovered: two proposals were given the same number in the > > > "full text" section. > > > > > > - G. alleges e sees an "angle" on the mysterious Proposal 8265, but > > > eventually votes AGAINST. > > > > > > > Nice work. > > One note: in the future, could you indent sub-points than a single > > space? It took me a few seconds to see what the intent was. > > Sure; thanks for pointing it out. Do you think two spaces is enough? > > - Point > > - Sub-point > > -- > > > - Falsifian I would say the rule of thumb is that each level should have its indent marker at the position the last level's text started at, it makes them easy to spot in a quick scan. 2 is fine.
