On 10/20/19 2:46 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
R2152 actually covers both of those, using CANNOT (etc.) for platonic
cases and MAY NOT (etc.) for pragmatic cases. So a rule taking the
platonic approach to its subject may or may not make that approach
explicit by depending on the relevant parts of R2152.

Alright, that's fair. I'll drop those comments on R2152. I might try to work the Vanyel reference in somewhere else, but I can't guarantee anything.

--
Jason Cobb

Reply via email to