On 7/28/2019 12:41 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Like, forgive me if I'm missing something, but in light of that > provision I don't see how this could also be broken? > > Also, did you ever write that time security proto or come up with a > list of changes that would be satisfactory? I won't have time to think on "deep time protections" for a while. But I did read your proposal several times and (whether there's anything explicitly dangerous or not) it honestly struck me as similar to your comments about some of Jason Cobb's proposals - an inelegant and overly complex solution to a problem that I'm not convinced needs it. (I can't point to any particular thing that's "wrong" that's just my overall impression of the proposal as a whole). -G.
- DIS: [proto] Contract party fixes Jason Cobb
- DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Contract party fixes Kerim Aydin
- DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Contract party fixes Jason Cobb
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Contract party fixes Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Contract party fix... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Contract party... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Contract ... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Contr... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] C... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] C... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] C... Kerim Aydin
- DIS: Ratification via closed t... James Cook
- Re: DIS: Ratification via clos... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Ratification via clos... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Ratification via clos... James Cook
- Re: DIS: Ratification via clos... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Ratification via clos... James Cook
- DIS: Clairvoyand Roshambo (was... James Cook
- Re: DIS: Clairvoyand Roshambo ... Jason Cobb