On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 15:24 +1000, Rebecca wrote:
> I create the following proposal
> 
> Name: NO MORE APATHY
> AI: 1
> Text: Repeal rule 2465 "Victory By Apathy"

Huh? This incident is evidence that the rule is working by design.

Assume for a thought experiment this case is broken. Then if we didn't
have the Apathy rule, the brokenness would either go unreported, or
else be used to break something more important than a victory
condition.

The whole point of the rule is that if something goes wrong in the
dependent action rules, players use it to win rather than, e.g., force
through a ratification of a false statement.

-- 
ais523

Reply via email to