On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 8:28 AM nch <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/16/19 5:41 AM, D. Margaux wrote: > > Votes are below. > > > > Sorry if someone already raised this specifically, but CoE on the promotor > > distribution: If 8207 is a proposal at all, then it does have an AI per > > Rule 1950: "Adoption index (AI) is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran > > decisions and proposals. ... Adoption index is an essential parameter of > > an Agoran decision if that decision has an adoption index." > > > The proposal and the decision on the proposal are separate things. That > rule only states that AI is essential for the decision.
Does the decision correctly identify the "matter to be decided" (R107) if it lists a proposal that doesn't exist? (I.E. a proposal listed with the wrong AI is not the "matter to be decided" because such a proposal doesn't exist). In any case, I think the Proposal can no longer have <none> as an AI, I think Proposal 8200 took <none> away as a possible value, so it's at its new default (1.0). I originally thought something more interesting than that would happen when 8200 was adopted (which is why I kept the proposal in the Pool) but I misread the Rules precedence order on something, so it's just a boring AI-1 proposal now, I think.
