The latter - a one-person contract is basically (in past) a huge ticket
to all kinds of nonsense (including, yes, a scam that would be possible
now), requiring a second person really tends to damp that sort of thing out.
-G.
On 7/18/2019 6:48 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
Forgive me, but how much can you actually do if you are the only person
party to a contract, unless there's a pre-existing rules bug? Or is the
issue just that it would make such a bug exploitable with one person instead
of two?
Jason Cobb
On 7/18/19 8:46 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
8210 Jason Cobb 2.5 Single-party Contracts
AGAINST. Makes some scams too easy.
