On Sun, 2019-05-05 at 14:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> That makes sense - and clever little bug.  Does inserting the
> following sentence into R1607 do the trick:

That might potentially make officer pay harder to compute under some
hypothetical economic systems.

Is there any reason not to just make resolving decisions
unconditionally mandatory? (Are there any cases where we'd want
decisions to be able to stick around indefinitely?)

-- 
ais523

Reply via email to