On Sun, 2019-05-05 at 14:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > That makes sense - and clever little bug. Does inserting the > following sentence into R1607 do the trick:
That might potentially make officer pay harder to compute under some hypothetical economic systems. Is there any reason not to just make resolving decisions unconditionally mandatory? (Are there any cases where we'd want decisions to be able to stick around indefinitely?) -- ais523