On Sun, 2019-05-05 at 10:44 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On 5/4/2019 6:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > With respect, this is the ruleset published in February. There was > plenty > > of time even before the slowdown for any errors to be caught. > > I think everyone was waiting for someone else to act as an editor to > do a conscious proofread (i.e. "just in case"), and then endorse em. > But at this point just gonna shrug: > > I vote FOR 8174A > I vote FOR 8175. > > I act on behalf of Halian to vote as above.
When this was last suggested, I checked the ruleset for mistakes that would prevent the proposals system working. I just did the same check again. There's nothing obviously broken in the proposals system. The main brokenness I note is that if there are two proposal distributions in the same week, the Assessor CAN resolve the second distribution, but NEED NOT, and nobody can deputise for em to do so either. This doesn't seem game-breaking to me, but could plausibly lead to proposals failing to resolve by mistake. (The resolution would, of course, self-ratify even if invalid, as long as nobody pointed the issue out.) -- ais523
