On 2/17/2019 4:05 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:> I have no objection to ratifying the fact "player A judged CFJ B with> the result C", given that that fact has, in general, very little impact> on the gamestate.
I also just realized that, given that Moots are Decisions, a resolution message self-ratifies that the Moot decision existed and was resolved, even if the Moot wasn't started properly.
