> On Feb 17, 2019, at 5:11 PM, James Cook <jc...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > > Is it easy to make that a separate proposal from my amendment > proposal? Or is that complicated to do? I think it would make the most sense to do it in one proposal if we could, right? I’m not sure what the right language would be. Maybe: “The gamestate is changed as if the Rule amendments in this proposal had taken effect immediately after the addition of the first paragraph in that Rule that has the number 4, and as if no further changes had been made to that Rule since.” Could we add that to the fix proposal? Not sure if that could break something else though...?
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken Intent S... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken Intent S... Madeline
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken Inte... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken ... ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Br... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Br... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOK... ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOK... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken Inte... ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken Inte... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken Intent Scam D Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken Intent S... James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken Inte... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken ... Ørjan Johansen
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Br... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOK... James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOK... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken ... James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Br... James Cook
- DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken Intent Scam Timon Walshe-Grey
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY Broken Intent Scam Timon Walshe-Grey