Also... if intents are truly broken, that could lead to a lot of havoc in the
gamestate. It would be potentially impossible to sort out.
Maybe the fix legislation could say something like, “upon enactment of this
proposal, the gamestate is changed to be what it would have been if the list
had always been written the correct way.” Not sure how to make that language
work, but that would be the general idea.
If it worked right, that would eliminate the below scam and also make sure
nothing else is broken because of this intent issue.
> On Feb 17, 2019, at 8:08 AM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Intents may be completely broken, and if they are, then that will
> eliminate the apathy win I've been angling to get for a while. So, I
> think it's only fair to try to run a new scam based on the broken
> intents to get a win by paradox...
>
> The CFJ called below will have the judgement PARADOXICAL if intents
> (and therefore moots) are broken. If intents aren't broken, then it
> will have the judgement DISMISS.
>
> 1. AMEND THE LIVING ZOMBIE CONTRACT TO MOUSETRAP GAELAN AND ATMUNN.
>
> The parties to the Living Zombie contract are me, Gaelan and ATMunn.
> I can mousetrap them without violating my pledge, because my pledge
> has expired.
>
> Pursuant to the Living Zombie contract and CFJ 3689, I amend the text
> of the Living Zombie contract by deleting the text enclosed in
> parentheses below:
>
> //////
>
> The title of this contract is "Living Zombie."
>
> This contract is EFFECTIVE only if D. Margaux and at least one other
> player gave consent to it on 31 October 2018; otherwise it is
> INEFFECTIVE.
>
> Any party to this contract CAN use this contract to perform one or
> more of the actions enclosed in brackets below:
>
> {
>
> (Any party to this contract CAN act on behalf of )D. Margaux( to take any
> action on behalf of eir zombie permitted by the Rules,
>
> Any party to this contract) CAN act on behalf of (D. Margaux to support
> or object to a dependent action,
>
> )Any party to this contract( CAN act on behalf of D. Margaux to withdraw
> or change or cast a vote on an Agoran decision, which D. Margaux SHALL
> NOT change).
>
> }
>
> Any party to this contract who attempts to publish a message that
> exercises any power granted under this contract SHALL include in the
> subject line of the message the word "SPOOKY," or else the attempt is
> INEFFECTIVE.
>
> On or after 7 November 2018, D. Margaux CAN terminate this contract by
> announcement and CAN amend it by deleting any text enclosed within
> brackets above, but not by the addition, substitution, or movement of
> any text.
>
> Any player CAN become a party to this contract by announcement.
>
> //////
>
>
>
> As a result, the contract now reads:
>
>
> //////
>
> The title of this contract is "Living Zombie."
>
> This contract is EFFECTIVE only if D. Margaux and at least one other
> player gave consent to it on 31 October 2018; otherwise it is
> INEFFECTIVE.
>
> Any party to this contract CAN use this contract to perform one or
> more of the actions enclosed in brackets below:
>
> {
>
> D. Margaux CAN act on behalf of Any party to this contract.
>
> }
>
> Any party to this contract who attempts to publish a message that
> exercises any power granted under this contract SHALL include in the
> subject line of the message the word "SPOOKY," or else the attempt is
> INEFFECTIVE.
>
> On or after 7 November 2018, D. Margaux CAN terminate this contract by
> announcement and CAN amend it by deleting any text enclosed within
> brackets above, but not by the addition, substitution, or movement of
> any text.
>
> Any player CAN become a party to this contract by announcement.
>
> //////
>
> 2. CALL A CFJ
>
> I call the following CFJ: "This CFJ is FALSE."
>
> 3. USE CERTIORARI TO ASSIGN IT TO THE PRIME MINISTER
>
> If I am Prime Minister, I issue the cabinet order of certiorari to
> assign this CFJ to myself.
>
> If ATMunn is Prime Minister, I use the Living Zombie contract to cause
> em to issue the cabinet order of certiorari to assign this CFJ to
> emself.
>
> 4. JUDGE IT PARADOXICAL
>
> Clearly the above-called CFJ is a paradox.
>
> If I am the judge, I judge it PARADOXICAL, then self-file a motion for
> reconsideration, then judge it PARADOXICAL again.
>
> If ATMunn is the judge, I use the Living Zombie contract to cause em
> to judge it PARADOXICAL, then cause em to self-file a motion for
> reconsideration of that CFJ, then cause em to judge it PARADOXICAL
> again.
>
> 5. FORCE GAELAN AND ATMUNN TO SUPPORT GROUP-FILED RECONSIDERATION
> // only works if intents are not broken
>
> I intend with 2 support to move to reconsider the above-called CFJ. I
> cause ATMunn and Gaelan to support that intent. I move to reconsider
> that CFJ.
>
> I note that the CFJ is not relevant to the game. Therefore, if I am
> the judge, I judge that CFJ DISMISS. If ATMunn is the judge, I use
> the Living Zombie contract to cause em to judge that CFJ DISMISS.
