That really wasn't the point to take away from that message, but okay. On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 11:39 ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk < ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 11:37 -0600, Reuben Staley wrote: > > Even simpler: players can submit proposals but a different person has > > to pend them, after checking for mistakes. Oh, and it has to be an > > active player. > > Given that pending isn't in the rules at the moment, the dependent > action version is likely simpler. > > Pending is /safer/, though, because it allows the proposal to be > validly distributed even if the pending went wrong, meaning less > uncertainty about the gamestate if the Promotor makes a mistake. > > -- > ais523 > >
