Proto: create proposals with 1 support. Supporter SHOULD check the proposal against [list of common mistakes we keep somewhere]
Gaelan > On Nov 1, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > When I wrote Paydays (I think I drafted that text), I purposefully wanted > Speaker to be a sinecure with a salary, as a perk for winning. > > Aside: I really hate the lack of pending, and just plopping proposals in > the pool without review (including mine). Watching the proposals in the > last couple weeks has really just turned me off trying to participate in > that process. YMMV. > > >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: >> Hold up, were you even around when we had shinies? Are you just an Agoran >> History nerd? This seems like a mistake only a person who joined before >> your time cold have committed. >> >> On Nov 1, 2018 10:30, "Timon Walshe-Grey" <m...@timon.red> wrote: >> >> I submit the following proposal: >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> Title: With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies >> Adoption index: 2.0 >> Author: twg >> Co-authors: >> >> Amend rule 2559, "Paydays", by changing the text "For each office" to >> "For each office that has official duties". >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> >> >> -twg >> >
