When I wrote Paydays (I think I drafted that text), I purposefully wanted
Speaker to be a sinecure with a salary, as a perk for winning.
Aside: I really hate the lack of pending, and just plopping proposals in
the pool without review (including mine). Watching the proposals in the
last couple weeks has really just turned me off trying to participate in
that process. YMMV.
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Hold up, were you even around when we had shinies? Are you just an Agoran
> History nerd? This seems like a mistake only a person who joined before
> your time cold have committed.
>
> On Nov 1, 2018 10:30, "Timon Walshe-Grey" <m...@timon.red> wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> Title: With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: twg
> Co-authors:
>
> Amend rule 2559, "Paydays", by changing the text "For each office" to
> "For each office that has official duties".
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
>
> -twg
>
