But the Treasuror doesn't hold eir office via pledge.

CuddleBeam can't have it both ways.  If e makes a pledge with the 
expectation that the pledge's responsibilities grant em some legal 
privilege, and e is accused of breaking the responsibilities of
the pledge, standards of proof are appropriate to determine
whether or not e is keeping it and therefore whether e maintains
the privilege.

This doesn't have to be daily proof, but "an instance of proof 
if accused" is in keeping with criminal proceedings.

On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> The Treasuror is required to keep records of coins, but not 
> every day or minute. E breaks the rules only if e hasn’t 
> updated the records weekly in a report. 
> 
> Cuddle Beam has no required report for the information for which 
> e has pledged to be recordkeepor. So maybe there is no violation 
> for eir failure to keep those records until such time as a report 
> is required (which may be never)?
> 
> > On Oct 2, 2018, at 6:19 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 03:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Actually, if real-world currencies are mapped via contract to being
> >>> Agoran currencies, there *IS* a reporting requirement:
> >>>       The recordkeepor of a class of assets is the entity (if any)
> >>>       defined as such by, and bound by, its backing document. That
> >>>       entity's report includes a list of all instances of that class
> >>>       and their owners.
> >> 
> >> Right, but "implicit real-world contracts" won't be defining a
> >> recordkeepor. I think the standard of explicitness to do that wouldn't
> >> be overwhelmingly high, but would be high enough that it'd be hard to
> >> do by mistake.
> > 
> > Good point.  Actually, the real killer is that Contracts, to be 
> > recognized as such by Agoran law (and thus subject to Agoran record
> > requirements), have to made "with the intention that it be binding upon 
> > them and be governed by the [Agoran] rules."  So this line of argument
> > is a dead-end for real-world currencies which wouldn't be recognized
> > as contract-backed (due to lack of intent to be bound by Agora).
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>

Reply via email to